Get ready for the panel debate at Danish Security Fair 2023
At the Danish Security Fair, we are proud to bring together the security industry for a panel debate where we will jointly discuss: "Why do we in the security industry continue to perform mechanical security according to outdated standards?" and "How do we ensure that the new EN standards are implemented where necessary?"
Why is the debate important?
For many years, the mechanical security industry has followed the Insurance and Pension Fund (IPF) security classification ranging from YELLOW to RED class, with RED class being the highest. In July 2016, F&P decided to remove their classification in favor of the much more demanding EU standard, EN1627-30, which ranges from RC1 to RC6, as the highest.
Despite the introduction of the new and more demanding EN standards in July 2016, there is still confusion in the industry, with solutions still being implemented according to the old F&P standards. But why is this?
The panel
- Kasper Skov-Mikkelsen, CEO of SikkerhedsBranchen
- Jesper Florin, Head of Department at DBI - The Danish Institute of Fire and Security Technology
- Søren Kjeldmand, Chief Consultant at Forsikring & Pension
- Mads Ottosen Fricke, Head of Section at Danish Technological Institute
Date
August 31 at 14:15
Location
Danish Security Fair 2023 - Messe C in Fredericia
Get ready for the panel discussion
Understand the difference between EN1627-30 and the old F&P protection classes
Here's an overview of the differences in the standards and an explanation of why EN1627-30 is far more demanding. In an effort to make it easier to understand the differences, the focus is solely on the testing areas, although there are also major differences in requirements for installation, documentation and quality assurance.
For a thorough understanding of EN1627-30, you can read more at the following link: https://www.alux.dk/forskellen-mellem-standardtyvmetoden-og-en1627-30
Burglary test
While the previous F&P security classes only required protection against 1-2 standard burglars using simple tools and a break-in time of up to 10 minutes in the top RED class, the new standard EN1627-30 now requires a longer break-in time of up to 20 minutes in the highest RC6 class. However, the difference doesn't stop at the break-in time, it also includes the tools used. While the previous RED class in the old standards used simple tools like crowbars and screwdrivers, the highest RC6 class uses heavy-duty tools and very powerful power tools like large angle grinders and reciprocating saws.
The break-in time for the old F&P protection classes:
YELLOW: Break-in time with simple tools: 3 min.
GREEN: Break-in time with simple tools: 5 min.
BLUE: Break-in time with simple tools: 7 min.
RED: Break-in time with simple tools: 10 min.
The break-in time for RC security classes:
The requirement is that a 250x400 mm opening must be made within the burglary time below.
RC3: Break-in time with simple tools: 5 min.
RC4: Break-in time with standard tools: 10 min.
RC5: Break-in time with heavy tools and power tools: 15 min.
RC6: Break-in time with extra heavy-duty tools and heavy-duty power tools: 20 min.
Static test - pull, push and push-up
While there is a significant difference in the burglary test and the new burglary test presents a much greater challenge, the upgraded requirements for tensile, compression and compression testing are also extremely important - especially in terms of product breadth.
Previously, the tensile, compression and jacking requirements in the old F&P protection classes were limited to a maximum of what two people could apply. In contrast, the EN1627-30 requirements for tension, compression and rebound are at least 300 kg in the lowest protection class, RC2. Although the world record for weightlifting is 484 kg, 300 kg is a much greater load than what 1-2 standard burglars can apply.
This strengthened test and product width requirements ensure that security products meet the necessary security standards. A consequence of the lack of product width requirements under the old test method was that narrow grilles/blinds (with low elasticity and high stiffness) were tested, while very wide grilles/blinds (with high elasticity and deflection) could be delivered within the same security class. According to the new standard, the product width is now limited to a maximum of 100 mm wider than the tested product.
Pull, push and pull test for RC fuse classes:
RC2: Hydraulic traction, pressure and jacking up to 300 kg.
RC3: 600 kg hydraulic traction, pressure and jacking up.
RC4: Hydraulic traction, pushing and jacking up to 1000 kg.
RC5: Hydraulic traction, pushing and jacking up to 1000 kg.
RC6: 1500 kg hydraulic traction, pushing and jacking.
Test requirements that must be met:
Max. 150 mm opening when jacking up.
Min. 10 mm engagement in guide rails when pushing/pulling.
Dynamic testing
Dynamic testing is a new test requirement in EN1627-30 and is therefore not included in the tests for the old F&P protection classes. In the dynamic test, a 50 kg swing pendulum is tested against the securing product.
Dynamic testing:
RC2: Drop height: 450 mm.
RC3: Drop height: 750 mm.
RC4: Drop height: No requirement.
Test requirements that must be met:
No opening allowed at the pendulum switch.
Conclusion
From the test sites alone, it's safe to conclude that following EN1627-30 achieves a significantly higher standard of certified security products. This provides both customers and insurance companies with a better security solution and minimizes the risk of successful break-in attempts, which can ultimately save trauma, inconvenience and compensation costs.